Discover the Anyleads suite | Find emails, verify emails, install a chatbot, grow your business and more!.
blog

Does LinkedIn allow scraping?



Does LinkedIn allow scraping?


The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Monday decided in favor of hiQ Labs and upheld its right to collect information about users by scraping publicly accessible content from social media sites such as LinkedIn.

hiQ Labs is an automated tool used to gather data about people who have applied for or are currently employed at a particular employer. The company has made software available for companies that want to use it to find employees with specific skillsets -- something employers often need but may be unable to obtain through traditional methods.

hiQ Labs collects data using a script called ScraperBot, which scans public profile pages on websites like LinkedIn and extracts details about job seekers. It then sends those results back to the company. In addition to collecting data, the bot also performs other tasks related to building out the database. For example, it helps to keep track of new hires over time so that the company can see if someone who was hired previously left because they were fired (a common reason why people quit) or moved elsewhere within the organization.

LinkedIn filed suit against hiQ Labs after learning that the startup had been gathering data without permission. "We're disappointed," said LinkedIn spokesperson Janine Fricklas during a call discussing the ruling. She added that the company's goal is to protect user privacy when it comes to their personal information online.

"If we knew what was going on with our members' information, we would take action immediately."

It's unclear whether LinkedIn will appeal the decision, though some experts believe that the case could affect more than just hiQ Labs. There are many similarities between hiQ Labs and another scraper program called CareerBuilder, which has been accused of illegal activity since 2016. Both programs scan LinkedIn profiles for key words and store them.

In January 2020, a federal judge issued an injunction blocking career-search website CareerBuilder and its parent company Gannett Co., Inc. from accessing any further data collected by CareerBuilder until the issue was resolved. That means no longer being able to access all the information gathered by CareerBuilder's bots.

How do you not get caught web scraping?

Web scraping isn't always easy, especially given the complexity of modern security measures. Some people think it's impossible to avoid getting caught scraping data, even if you don't intend to sell anything off of your collection. Here are some ways to make sure that doesn't happen.

First of all, there are two types of scraping. One involves simply downloading data from websites where it's freely available. This type is generally seen as harmless enough, although some government agencies still consider certain kinds of web crawling to be unlawful. Other times, scraping occurs while trying to circumvent restrictions on how much data you can pull down before having to pay up.

That second kind is commonly referred to as black hat web scraping, and it's usually done by programmers looking to steal intellectual property. These sorts of scripts are known as malware or adware. They'll infect your computer and begin harvesting data. Sometimes these attacks come in the form of malicious browser extensions. Others work via remote code execution exploits, making it possible to install malware into machines remotely.

You should never try to run a piece of software on your own machine unless you've verified that you trust it completely. If you suspect that you might be infected, contact the developer directly and ask if he or she wants to help remove whatever infection you might have. You shouldn't attempt to delete files manually yourself either. Instead, run anti-malware software designed specifically to clean up infections.

Even if you aren't trying to hide behind a screen name, you probably wouldn't want anyone else knowing exactly what you're doing online. So you'll want to encrypt your data transfer whenever possible. Most major browsers now offer built-in encryption tools, including Chrome and Firefox. On Windows computers, BitTorrent Sync offers similar functionality. And if you're working with a third party vendor, you might want to look at SSL certificates.

It is necessary to buy SSL certificate and install it on the server for safe data transfer between the server and the browser.

Is Google web scraping legal?

Google can't legally search your email account for keywords. But it certainly can crawl the internet for useful bits of info.

In 2017, the Federal Trade Commission fined Google $22 million for violating Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair competition. Specifically, the agency charged that Google violated the law by misrepresenting the extent to which its comparison shopping service compares prices across retailers.

While Google did violate the terms of its settlement agreement with the FTC, it wasn't found guilty of breaking the law itself. Still, the FTC is continuing to monitor the situation closely.



Can you get sued for scraping?

As mentioned earlier, hiQ Labs didn't actually break any laws when it started scanning LinkedIn profiles. However, that hasn't stopped the tech giant from pursuing legal action.  On May 25th, 2019, LinkedIn filed a lawsuit against hiQ Labs, alleging copyright infringement, trademark violation, false advertising, breach of contract, and deceptive trade practices.

According to LinkedIn, hiQ Labs illegally obtained data from its site by creating a copy of the entire page through a series of "scrapes". Those actions supposedly caused the platform to suffer damages totaling nearly $10 million.

This isn't the first time LinkedIn has tried to sue someone over its data. In 2018, LinkedIn won a patent victory against Facebook over a feature that lets users share posts with only select groups of friends. At the time, LinkedIn claimed that Facebook infringed upon one of its patents.

A few years later, however, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office rejected LinkedIn's claim. A spokesman told us at the time that the USPTO determined that Facebook didn't violate any of LinkedIn's patents.

Can I get in trouble for web scraping?

Probably not. While most courts agree that web scraping violates the Copyright Law, they tend to side with companies that argue that scraping is necessary to provide services to customers. As long as a business provides value beyond the mere act of grabbing information, it's unlikely that anyone will ever successfully sue a company for scraping.

For example, LinkedIn says that it uses scraping to build databases to give better recommendations. Companies that rely on scraping say that they need to access large amounts of data quickly to stay competitive. Even so, it seems likely that the courts will eventually rule that scraping is indeed illegal. When it does, it remains to be seen whether the courts will force businesses to destroy all existing copies of the data they'd originally accessed.

A federal appeals court on Monday ruled against LinkedIn and upheld an earlier decision by a lower court judge who found that the social network does not have the right to block automated access to its website for commercial purposes. 

The ruling is a big win for hiQ Labs, which has been working with other companies to automate their processes using LinkedIn's public API -- something LinkedIn prohibits under its terms of service. The case was originally brought forward by LinkedIn against hiQ Labs back in 2017 after the startup launched a program called "Scrapy" that allowed users to download publicly available information about people listed on the site.

hiQ Labs had argued that since some of those individuals might be aware of the scrapping activities taking place, it violated their privacy rights as well as those of others whose information may also have been accessed without consent. The startup contended that there are no laws prohibiting such activity because those involved aren't violating any contractual agreements between LinkedIn and individual members or potential employers.

But in a 2-1 opinion issued late last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit said that if you're going to use someone else's content, then you must get permission first. In addition, the appeals court noted that while users can opt out of having their profile shared with third parties through an intermediary like LinkedIn, they cannot do so directly.

In short, the judges concluded that LinkedIn isn't entitled to protect itself from being used as a tool for automation when doing so doesn't harm anyone involved. That means that LinkedIn will need to change its policies regarding the removal of posts and account terminations, among other things.

This comes amid growing concerns over the rise of AI and automation across industries around the world. Last year, a report published by McKinsey & Co. estimated that up to 50 percent of current job roles could soon become redundant due to advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence technology. And many experts believe that automation poses one of the biggest threats to employment in the coming decades.

For example, Facebook recently announced plans to hire thousands of new employees to help manage all of the incoming requests for restricted accounts and remove fake accounts created by bots. Apple CEO Tim Cook told CNBC that he believes automation will eventually lead to widespread unemployment.

And just weeks ago, Google announced that it would begin replacing human workers with machines at call centers in India. This follows similar moves made by Amazon, Microsoft, Oracle, IBM, and Salesforce. All five companies have stated that they plan to increase investments into developing more advanced forms of AI and robotics that will ultimately replace humans altogether.

It depends. If your business is looking to collect information from websites that don't require registration, then yes, you should absolutely be able to go ahead and scrape them. But what happens if there's a clause buried deep within a Terms Of Service agreement that states otherwise? Many large sites -- including Facebook and Twitter -- prohibit scraping unless certain conditions are met (such as providing attribution).

If you want to know whether or not you can scrape a particular site, always check the ToS before proceeding. You'll find links to relevant sections of each TOS document near the bottom of every page. While some sites are more straightforward than others, most tend to contain language that prevents automated tools from accessing their services.

Generally speaking, yes. However, there are exceptions. For instance, scraping data from government agencies is often prohibited by law. As long as you're only copying and pasting public records, though, you should be fine -- even if you're trying to sell the results to another party.

There are several reasons why this is true. First off, there's nothing inherently wrong with collecting data from public sources. Second, it simply wouldn't make sense for businesses and organizations to pay millions of dollars annually to operate databases filled with valuable information that everyone can easily obtain for free. Finally, governments usually understand that these types of restrictions are necessary to keep citizens safe.

As far as private sites are concerned, however, there are two important considerations to take into consideration. One involves copyright infringement issues -- namely, whether or not the original owner of the content gave you express written permission to repurpose it. Another relates to personal privacy -- specifically, whether or not the person whose details were captured actually consented to the process.

When dealing with sensitive material, it's best to reach out to the creator yourself before proceeding. Otherwise, you run the risk of accidentally breaching their trust and potentially landing yourself in hot water.

Yes, but again, we recommend contacting the author first. Some publishers restrict access to articles based on licensing agreements, whereas others impose strict rules concerning the sharing of copyrighted materials. These restrictions apply regardless of whether or not you intend to monetize the data later down the line.

Is scraping illegal in Europe?

No. There are few countries where scraping is completely banned, although Germany is probably the closest thing to a blanket ban in existence today. Other European nations rely heavily upon existing legislation surrounding intellectual property protection and fair use, meaning that there are very few instances where scraping is outright prohibited.

Nonetheless, it's worth noting that there are still plenty of gray areas surrounding online privacy that make it difficult to determine exactly what constitutes acceptable behavior. You can avoid getting caught in situations like this by following the steps outlined above.

Again, the answer here depends on the type of content you're attempting to gather. Sites that host public record information typically fall into this category. If you're merely gathering news stories from newspapers, then you shouldn't have much trouble making it happen. Unfortunately, it becomes trickier once you start looking beyond mainstream media outlets.

That's because Australian publications generally reserve the right to charge readers for access to their content. So, you won't see anyone selling ads against newspaper headlines or anything like that. But you will likely encounter problems if you're interested in mining archived reports from major news networks.

Depending on the circumstances, yes. However, you should note that there are certain limitations associated with the country's Copyright Act. Specifically, Section 43(2) states that "it shall be unlawful for a person knowingly to copy... the whole or part of a work in digital form."

While this provision applies broadly enough to prevent almost any kind of scraping activity, it's important to remember that it only covers works that are protected by copyright law. According to Wikipedia, this includes books, films, computer programs, software, music, photographs, paintings, sculptures, architecture, maps, plays, musical scores, sound recordings, and broadcasts.

On top of this, Section 44 makes it clear that "anyone who copies a work in digital format without the authority of the copyright holder may be liable to criminal prosecution," provided that the offense takes place outside of a licensed venue.

Finally, Section 45 allows for civil penalties to be imposed in cases involving infringements that involve either copyright, trademark, trade name, design, or title. It's possible, therefore, that a publisher could pursue a copyright violation claim against someone who violates their terms of service.

Of course, none of this is meant to discourage you from pursuing scraping projects in South Africa. Rather, it's aimed at helping you better understand the risks inherent in the undertaking.

Technically speaking, no. When it comes to Japanese law, anyone who uses a robot to perform tasks that would normally require human labor faces fines ranging anywhere from $5,000 to $100,000 depending on the severity of the crime. Companies that employ robots for this purpose face higher fines, too.

However, this rule exists solely to ensure that businesses remain competitive in a global marketplace. The idea behind it is to encourage innovation by preventing established firms from gaining unfair advantages over newcomers.

Because of this, it doesn't necessarily matter if you're using a robot to collect information. What matters instead is whether or not you're breaking any local regulations pertaining to industrial espionage. Again, it's advisable to consult industry professionals prior to embarking on any project related to this matter. Doing so will greatly improve the chances of avoiding costly fines and/or lawsuits.

Once again, the answer hinges upon context. Just like in Japan, Chinese authorities frown upon the use of robotic devices designed for extracting data from various kinds of content. However, if you're operating entirely within the confines of a foreign jurisdiction, then you should feel pretty comfortable exploring whatever opportunities exist in the region.

That's especially true given the fact that China now hosts more internet traffic than North America.

The latest case involving an alleged infringement by LinkedIn on its users’ privacy has been decided. A California federal judge sided with hiQ Labs and said it was allowed to use automated software programs to access data from people's publicly available profiles without their consent or knowledge.

LinkedIn claimed the company violated its terms of service when it used its API  to create an automatic system that collected information about members' professional networks and job listings. The company also argued that the tool could be dangerous if it were widely adopted because it would give people easy access to valuable personal information like names, email addresses, phone numbers, and even passwords. In response, LinkedIn filed a civil suit against hiQ Labs last year. Now, after several months of litigation, both parties have agreed to settle out of court.

hiQ Labs is a small startup based in San Francisco whose mission statement reads "To democratize business." Its CEO, David Sacks, told us he wanted his product to help businesses find candidates who are qualified enough for the positions they're hiring for but don't necessarily fit into traditional hiring practices -- i.e. someone who might not have a resume, or perhaps doesn't have one at all. He says that companies often struggle to identify these individuals through human resources departments alone. So hiQ Labs created a platform called HiQ Job Search, which uses an algorithm to analyze data pulled from public profiles on the site. It then creates a list of potential matches between those looking for work and employers seeking employees. And it offers a way for recruiters to contact them directly.

"HiQ allows HR professionals to look beyond resumes," Sacks wrote in an email. "We've found many times that there are very good talent, just outside the norm, who want to change careers. We want to make sure we connect them with great opportunities."

But while the program does provide some useful services to anyone using it (like being able to see what other companies are paying in salary), it also gives away more than a little bit of personal info about each person. As part of the settlement agreement, LinkedIn will no longer share any personally identifiable information with third-party vendors such as hiQ Labs or others. However, it can still sell anonymized versions of the data gathered to advertisers. According to the press release announcing the settlement, LinkedIn says it will continue to support its current customers. But it won't offer new products that rely on the same tech.

If you're wondering whether your own profile qualifies as private data, here's what LinkedIn considers confidential and why. If you're curious about getting started with scraping LinkedIn profiles yourself, check out our guide to doing so legally.

Can you scrape LinkedIn data?

It depends on where you live. While the U.S. Supreme Court recently struck down laws that made it illegal to search online databases for information, it didn't address the issue of scraping. That means it remains perfectly legal to go onto LinkedIn itself and pull up every single piece of information you can find about somebody. There are plenty of ways to do this, including by going through the site's advanced search function, visiting individual pages, or installing browser extensions that let you scan entire websites for specific details.

There are two ways to approach this task, depending on whether or not you plan on sharing what you collect with others. You can either keep everything to yourself and only view the results once, or save copies of each page before closing the tab. This latter method is known as screencapping. It isn't technically "scraping", since you aren't taking anything off of the original website. Instead, you're saving content that already exists elsewhere.

Of course, if you choose to share your findings, you'll need to consider what kind of restrictions apply. For example, if you start posting links to certain people's profiles, you may run afoul of LinkedIn's Terms of Service. Also, as mentioned above, you should always ask permission first.

And finally, remember that if you ever decide to post something you found online back to Twitter or Facebook, it might come across differently than intended. People tend to believe things posted on social media as fact until proven otherwise.

Can you get in trouble for web scraping?

According to LinkedIn, there are numerous reasons why you could wind up in hot water over your scrapping activities. They include violating its Terms of Service, copyright law, and possibly breaking local laws. To avoid any surprises, though, it's important to understand exactly what you're agreeing to when signing up for a paid account (or registering for a premium version).

For starters, you agree to abide by LinkedIn's Terms of Use. Section 4(a) states that "you shall not reproduce, duplicate, copy, sell, trade, resell, exploit, modify, broadcast, publish, transmit or distribute any Content obtained from LinkedIn except as permitted under these Terms of Use." Also, section 5(b)(i) prohibits collecting any information from LinkedIn unless the member consents to it explicitly.

In addition, the company reserves the right to terminate your membership if you violate its policies regarding spamming, impersonation, harassment, hate speech, discriminatory statements, fraudulent activity, or if you take actions that undermine its ability to protect its intellectual property rights.

Finally, there's also the matter of copyright law. Article 17.01 of the DMCA states that "No person shall circumvent a technological measure..." meaning that if you try to bypass a security feature that prevents unauthorized access to copyrighted material, you could face severe penalties.

This applies to any automated process that tries to access protected works (including images, songs, movies, etc.) regardless of whether or not you intend to redistribute them.

Here's another interesting thing to note. Under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, you could potentially be held liable for $150 per violation.



Can I get sued for web scraping?

As long as you follow all the rules outlined above, you shouldn't encounter too much difficulty. After all, most sites are pretty liberal when it comes to allowing visitors to browse freely. Just be careful to respect their boundaries and don't harass anybody.

That said, there are rare cases where people have actually gotten sued for scraping. One notable example occurred in 2014 when a man named Andrew Auernheimer got hit with a $500 million dollar judgment after repeatedly accessing a database containing sensitive customer information belonging to AT&T Mobility, Inc.. His lawyers tried arguing that he wasn't responsible for the breach, saying the real culprit was a hacker who had breached the site earlier that day. Unfortunately, a jury disagreed, ruling that Auernheimer had intentionally accessed the database himself.

Another famous case involved Craigslist founder Craig Newmark. Back in 2011, he took action against a group of teenagers who had allegedly stolen thousands of photos from the site. Since Newmark believed his photos weren't properly credited, he threatened to sue. The teens eventually reached a settlement instead.

Is scraping the internet legal?

Whether or not you're willing to risk a lawsuit, it seems safe to say that it's completely legal to scrape LinkedIn. As far as we know, nobody has ever successfully prosecuted an individual for scraping. But if anyone decides to take the time to investigate your behavior, they could certainly claim that you broke their TOS.

Even if you never receive a warning letter, it's possible that a few well placed screenshots could ruin your reputation forever. So if you value your career, it probably makes sense to play nice with LinkedIn. At least until you become a household name.


Author

Anyleads

San Francisco

We are the leading marketing automation platform serving more than 100,000 businesses daily. We operate in 3 countries, based in San Francisco, New York, Paris & London.

Join Anyleads to generate leads

Error! Impossible to register please verify the fields or the account already exists.. Error, domain not allowed. Error, use a business email. Welcome to the Anyleads experience!
More than +200 features to generate leads
Register to start generating leads

Create your account and start your 7 day free trial!

Error! Impossible to register please verify the fields or the account already exists.. Error, domain not allowed. Error, use a business email. Welcome to the Anyleads experience! By registering you agree to the Terms and conditions agreement.
More than +200 features to generate leads

We offer multiple products for your lead generation, discover them below!

>> Unlimited access to all products with one single licensecheck our pricing.